EVAULATION:
In what ways does your media product use,
develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
Other examples of typical
conventions used in opening sequences in which we use are, introducing the
narrative. We show this in our film sequence this by showing a relevant range
of scenes spanning over a period of time so that audience is knowledgeable of
the past events of the character and the present time. This shows them how the
character got to the present time. Although we do not give too much of the
storyline away to keep the audience intrigued by creating several narrative
enigmas. We also introduce a number of themes involved within our storyline,
this is also a common factor used for openings. This included our themes of
mental illness, revenge, fear and violence, which are commonly used in the
thriller genre. We use the effect of adding titles; this is used in the
majority of opening film sequences. These titles include actor’s names, movie
production, names of people involved and the film title. We chose to use a
larger font for the movie production and film title as these are quite
significant and important for the audience to know. We decided to use black
backgrounds when font is involved as this is a common colour used in film
thrillers as it associated with negativity. We use a smaller font the names as
we add it in during the scenes and it is easy to identify whose name is whose.
Although we have used a number of
conventions commonly used in thrillers we also have used an unusual approach.
This is created by our choice to use diegetic sound straight away contrasting
to the more traditional method of using a soundtrack, which we do not use until
a little into the sequence. This opposes narrative enigmas as well as
gains the audience’s attention and therefore they will wish to watch on. However
we also challenge the convention of a typical dark, dirty atmosphere and an
example of a film which uses this setting is ‘Dream House’
2011 seen in the image below. We
challenge this convention by using a white, fresh, clinical room. We did this to
emphasise the importance of our main characters mental illness in the
storyline. We challenge the convention of typical weapons you would expect to
see in thrillers as we use the theme of the characters mental illness which is
quite significant, without involving any use of weapons.
How does your media product represent
particular social groups?
When selecting our main character we decided
to choose a young, white, vulnerable female. This is because it is a typical
thriller convention, seen in many film thrillers such as; Orphan 2009.
Also the fact that she is kidnapped whilst going out to a party and partying could
be seen as a stereotypical thing for young girls to do in today’s society.
Our group decided to use
relatively stereotypical representations as we believe that the cases are more
believable and relatable. Therefore they seem more realistic and can have more
of a thriller element towards the audience, this element being that the
audience know what the role of each character is and therefore can just focus
on the storyline and action.
An example of another thriller
that uses mental illness in a similar way to the way we chose to present it is The Devil Inside (2012)
and Stalker (2010).
What kind of media institution might
distribute your media product and why?
Who would be the audience for your media product?
The target audience for our thriller
opening is based on a particular age, looking mainly from our research bracket
somewhere over the age of 16 to 25, who were the main fans of thriller movies,
which we carried out through questionnaires that had both quality and quantify.
This
research helped us consider what form our final film should take, as well
as casting, scripting and setting choices, such as the language choice in some
aspects, of which including not having swear words because some of them would
be recommending the movie to younger children.
We also researched the official film
certificate and found that our synopsis and use of violence made our film best
fit the certificate 15 band. Therefore it is illegal for anyone under the age
of 15 to watch it. For this reason our film will be targeted at anybody over
the age of 15. We believe that young adults will be our main age group, most
probably 16-25 years old.
We also think that our thriller will appeal
to both men and women. This is because there are both genders involved within
our thriller. Due to using a young female, this could attract the male
audience. As well as females as they could possibly be sympathetic and have an
understanding towards the character and the storyline, as well as using a male
as the lead protagonist.
How did you attract/address your audience?
We
attracted/addressed our audience with sound, camera angles and graphics. We
selected a soundtrack for our opening that is eerie as it creates suspense and
draws the audience in. When creating our opening we altered our initial idea,
which was to film the back of two characters heads when walking down the
corridor to their feet. We decided to film the feet walking instead as this
adds mystery and suspense as you can’t see who they are or where they are
going. Other narrative enigmas that also arise through the conventions we chose
to involve in our opening is the use of a non-diegetic piece of sound of a
police call. The police call is extremely brief but we did this purposely
because it will attract the audience as they will be curious and intrigued to
find out what it is about and what is going to happen.
Our choice of camera angles helps to
address the audience about our characters. By using a high angle shot the
audience can get the impression that the character is weak and hopeless. Using
close up shots allows the audience to familiarise themselves with the character
in the shot as well as being aware of the facial expression so they can
understand the emotions and perhaps sympathise for the character.
We decided to use certain conventions of
thrillers of which the audience know and therefore will enjoy, such as stings.
This genre (thriller) is also popular with our target audience, so this would
gain their attention. We also had the film based on real life experiences; this
will attract audiences as it could happen to them.
Due to our genre being a thriller, we
mainly tried to create suspense and spark narrative enigmas to interest the
audience. Many people would ask ‘What happens to her?’ and ‘Does the kidnapper
get caught?’, which would be prompted by seeing the character of Sally away
from the kidnapping character. We also
wanted to build up the audience’s anticipation when Sally flips out. This will
attract the audience to keep watching and make them anxious as to what’s going
to happen next. By choosing to keep the reason she was kidnapped and the reason
for it as well as who her kidnapper is creates other narrative enigmas.
What have you learnt about
technologies from the process of constructing this product?
From making our thriller opening, we have
all learnt a lot about the process and techniques required when making a film.
Something we encountered in terms of problems on the set was how we had to move a dining room around in order to make sure that nothing we didn’t want in the shot. This included tables, chairs, photos and shoes.
We were also only first introduced to the
editing software ‘Sony Vegas Movie Studio Platinum 12.0’ when we came to
producing the film. This meant
that it was essential for all of us to learn the basics and then it was
relatively easy to pick up more techniques and methods when it came to
exploring ways in order to edit our opening. We found that each member of our
group was stronger in different elements and this worked out easy to allocate
jobs with no problems. A particularly hard factor was synchronising the sound
to match up with the footage, but eventually this was solved.
To improve the process and methods of making our film we
definitely would have made sure we had better time management as we found that
editing needed a lot more time and was a much longer process than each of us
had first anticipated. We also found that once we had uploaded our first shots
there were small errors that were impossible to edit into continuous shots.
Therefore we had to refilm the majority of our film and this took up a
substantial amount of our editing time that we later found that we needed.
Looking back at your preliminary
task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full
product?
The briefs for the preliminary
and main task give a scope of what kind of progression what we were going to
undertake. For the preliminary task, the simple objective of someone simply
opening a door, crossing a room, sitting down and partaking in dialogue with
another character and some matching shots as well as shot/reverse shot. This
simplicity meant the sequence was kept uncomplicated, with the main focus on
continuity editing.
Before we began for both tasks,
we had an initial brainstorming session where we considered
our initial ideas for the film, some location ideas and actors. After this, we
produced a storyboard, a shooting script and dialogue. This process let us
develop the seed for our ideas into a shared vision that helped each member of
the team know what was going to come from these tasks. For the main task, we
did location recces, which helped further the visualization of the end film,
something which we learnt we actually needed from doing the preliminary task
and not knowing where our location would be.
This planning helped us, but the
Preliminary task did not require the same amount of detail as the main task,
which caught us off guard in terms of
Even though we knew it would have been a bit more difficult, we were
willing to overcome the problems and complications by planning ahead,
brainstorming problems we might encounter, performing checks on the locations
to make sure there was nothing we could stop from going wrong actually going
wrong and getting what we needed and making sure every resource we had to use
was available to us, giving each other roles in order to take everything and put it into chunks for us to handle.
During the production of
preliminary task, there was no time to do test shoot or reshoot if there was a
mistake. This was because of a shortage of time, but we had some time for our
final piece barring no big mistakes. An example of when we had to do a reshoot
was for the interview scene, which we had to change our actor as well due to
scheduling problems. The reason for the reshoot was that we had to consider
continuity editing as well as getting some more shots.
We produced a shooting script
which let us organise our time more efficiently, allocating roles to each
member to cut down problems into bit sized chunks for everyone. These two
factors really helped save time as well as a simple method of saying sound
ready, camera ready and naming the take just so during the editing process when
we got down to editing the film, we had an ease of access getting around our
shots.
The progression from preliminary
task to full product taught us that the Reece’s were quite important in helping
us prepare for our filming; we had to do re-shoot so we could perfect our
mental image of our final film onto the screen perfectly. We encountered
various issues on our recces, such as sometimes getting a hard decent shot of
an outside building because of traffic. Another location we looked at for our
recce was our final location, the house. We had to rearrange some furniture to
get some shots that we could use in our pre-production to properly plan for our
production.
During editing, the preliminary
task’s main focus for us was just simply constructing something that made
sense, with no real story to portray through it. The editing process for the
preliminary task helped introduce us into what was needed and the basic
processes of editing. From this experience, we were prepared for the basics of
the editing, but not trying to really construct a narrative, which is what we
had to do for editing in the main task.
The final stage of both projects
is feedback & evaluation, which had several developments for us. Seeing as
the preliminary task didn’t require us to consider a lot, such as our target
audience, the main thing we all learnt was the basics of filming, editing and
others, which helped us in the theory and technical part, as well as it being
almost a test for our final stuff, where we would discover some practical
problems and consider them.
For our final piece, we had to
find a location, so we took in some problems that we had with the preliminary
task to find a good location that tackled sound issues. Sound issues we usually
encountered was footsteps, chatter from surrounding classrooms as well as the
occasional car going past when we did the preliminary task, so what we did was
look for a location where it would just be us in the building and it wasn’t
near a busy road so that we could get good sound recording. A problem we had encountered in the
preliminary task was that our sound seemed to end up solely in mono, so we
checked all the possible causes of this problem, attempted to compensate for it
and learn from it.
However, there was the smallest
piece of background noise that we didn’t pick up till very late in the editing
process, so it was too late to remove it. We had to keep to a timetable, so
that nothing would be done at the last minute. Target audience also plays a
factor in the film, so research we found was necessary, and receiving feedback
is very important, as is the teamwork.